Selected papers from Koa Health

We’re dedicated to sharing our knowledge with the larger scientific community and leveraging the benefits of peer review to create better health solutions for people everywhere.

That’s why we openly communicate our findings in industry publications such as JMIR MHealth Uhealth, ACM Press, and Behaviour Therapy.

For further details, access our full list of papers to date, or keep scrolling for a selection from our research team.

CBT via smartphone

Smartphone-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has become more common over time, but it still doesn’t use smartphone capabilities to their full potential. Can we leverage these capabilities more effectively to optimise treatment?

Optimizing smartphone cognitive behavioral therapy for body dysmorphic disorder using passive smartphone data: Initial insights from an open pilot trial’, JMIR MHealth Uhealth, 2020.

Development and testing of CBT for BDD

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) but access is an issue. Could user-centered treatment via smartphone provide a feasible, acceptable and satisfactory solution to the problem of accessibility?

Development and pilot testing of a cognitive behavioral therapy digital service for body dysmorphic disorder’, Behavior Therapy, August, 2019.

Mood prediction models in bipolar disorder

Sensors already embedded in our mobile phones have the potential to anticipate moods swings in bipolar disorder to enable more timely treatment. Can these prediction models for this purpose be generic, or do they need to be personalised to each patient?

Personalized versus generic mood prediction models in bipolar disorder’, Mental Health and Well-being: Sensing and Intervention Workshop in conjunction with UBICOMP 2018 Conference, Singapore, 2018.

Technology and mental health: Insights from a decade of research

A significant body of research in ubiquitous computing is devoted to the design of technologies for the continuous monitoring, diagnosis and care of mental health conditions. By analysing the last ten years of research in this field can we better address the technical and clinical challenges of designing ubiquitous computing technology for the decade to come?

A decade of ubiquitous computing research in mental health’, IEEE Pervasive Computing 19, no. 1, 2020.

Expert views on the future of pervasive health

Pervasive health is about bringing people and knowledge together to create higher performing healthcare. But what must be done to create pervasive health solutions? What technological challenges, adoption and adherence barriers, and ethical issues must be addressed?

The Future of pervasive health’, IEEE Pervasive Computing Journal, vol. 16, no., pp. 16-20, 2017.

Mobile network data for mental health

Mobile phones generate an unprecedented amount of human behavioural data at individual and aggregated levels. But how can we apply this data to public health? What are the opportunities and challenges involved?

Mobile network data for public health: Opportunities and challenges ’, Frontiers of Public Health, 2015.

Aligning daily activities with personality

When it comes to improving health and subjective wellbeing, recommender systems haven’t been sufficiently explored. And while recent advances in mobile technologies and user modelling present opportunities for delivering such systems, understanding the drivers of subjective wellbeing at an individual level is key. So the question becomes, how can the congruence between activities and personality traits be maximised to improve subjective wellbeing?

Aligning daily activities with personality: Towards a recommender system for improving wellbeing’, Proceedings of ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), 2019.

Cultural impact and automatic personality models

To make greater technology personalisation possible, sensor data collected from smartphones is used to infer users’ personality traits. But improving the accuracy of this type of inference is a significant challenge, especially when many models don’t consider the potential impact of culture on the data obtained. Could country-specific datasets improve trait prediction? And if so, by how much?

Modeling personality vs. modeling personalidad: In-the-wild mobile data analysis in five countries suggests cultural impact on personality models’, Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies archive (IMWUT), Volume 3 Issue 3, Presented at Ubicomp, London, UK, September 2019.

Data minimisation and personality classification

Passive personality modelling can help personalise mobile services but generally requires weeks or months of data collection and can negatively impact user engagement. But what if a few weekends would suffice for accuracy classifying personality traits towards improved user engagement?

Personality is revealed during weekends: Towards data minimisation for smartphone based personality classification’, INTERACT conference, 2019.

Data minimisation and colour blindness

Data minimisation is a useful tool in wellbeing recommender systems. But if it’s applied too generally across the board, can it lead to problems with colour blindness? If so, what are the implications of this colour blindness?

Auditing algorithms: On lessons learned and the risks of data minimization, ACM Press, 2020 .

Explainability in AI

Explainability in Artificial Intelligence is a crucial part of conveying safety and trust to users in the ‘how’ and ‘why’ of automated decision-making. TREPAN, an algorithm that explains artificial neural networks by means of decision trees, can be extended and used to generate more understandable explanations. But are these explanations more understandable for users than those generated by standard (unmodified) TREPAN?

Trepan reloaded: A knowledge-driven approach to explaining black-box models’, Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 2020.

Building a system to predict empathy

Researchers describe a system based on deep-learning for empathic emotion recognition developed to process multiple data streams, aka modalities integrated at a late stage (late fusion). Could this modular approach allow for ease of development, optimisation and future iterations?

Towards a multimodal time-based empathy prediction system', 14th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2019) IEEE, Chicago, 2019.

Explaining intelligent machines

What makes a good explanation, really? By exploring the cognitive dimensions of explaining intelligent machines can we identify what makes this process successful (and understandable) or not?

What makes a good explanation? Cognitive dimensions of explaining intelligent machines,‘ Proceedings 41th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2019, Montreal, Canada, pp. 25–26, 2019.

On the comparator model and sense of agency

A sense of agency is an indispensable part of how cognitive entities (biological and artificial) become cognitive agents. Can the comparator model used in developmental psychology to assess agency in early infancy be effectively used in robotics and artificial systems research?

A match does not make a sense: on the sufficiency of the comparator model for explaining the sense of agency’, Neuroscience of Consciousness, vol. 1(niz006), 2019, Oxford Academic/Oxford University Press, 2019.

Your choice regarding cookies on this site

We use cookies (of the digital, as opposed to the chocolate-chip variety) to show you personalized advertising and with analytic purposes. You can consent to the use of all cookies by clicking the acceptance button or configure or reject them through the preferences button.